汤德文, 刘均, 程远胜. 耐压液舱极限承载能力的影响因素分析与匹配设计[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2023, 18(4): 251–257. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02397
引用本文: 汤德文, 刘均, 程远胜. 耐压液舱极限承载能力的影响因素分析与匹配设计[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2023, 18(4): 251–257. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02397
TANG D W, LIU J, CHENG Y S. Influencing factors analyses and matching design of ultimate bearing capacity of external pressure tank[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(4): 251–257. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02397
Citation: TANG D W, LIU J, CHENG Y S. Influencing factors analyses and matching design of ultimate bearing capacity of external pressure tank[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(4): 251–257. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02397

耐压液舱极限承载能力的影响因素分析与匹配设计

Influencing factors analyses and matching design of ultimate bearing capacity of external pressure tank

  • 摘要:
      目的  旨在讨论相同的强度储备裕度条件下耐压船体与耐压液舱极限承载能力之间的关系,以获得二者极限承载能力相当的匹配设计。
      方法  首先,以典型的外置式耐压液舱为研究对象,在评估耐压液舱初始结构方案稳定性与极限承载能力的基础上,分析液舱壳板厚度、液舱实肋板厚度以及液舱横舱壁结构对耐压液舱极限承载能力的影响;随后,适当调整初始方案,获得耐压船体与耐压液舱强度储备裕度相当的设计方案,并在此基础上讨论耐压船体与耐压液舱极限承载能力之间的关系,进一步加强耐压船体,获得匹配耐压液舱与耐压船体承载能力的方案以及对应的强度裕度。
      结果  结果显示,减薄液舱壳板30%、液舱实肋板33.3%及液舱横舱壁30%,其极限承载能力将分别降低16.5%,36.4%和0.17%。
      结论  研究表明在相当强度储备裕度条件下,耐压船体的承载能力远低于耐压液舱的承载能力;在耐压液舱壳板的强度储备裕度约为25%、耐压船体壳板的强度储备裕度约为40%时,耐压船体与耐压液舱的极限承载压力大致相同。

     

    Abstract:
      Objectives  This paper aims to discuss the relationship between the ultimate bearing capacity of a pressure hull and pressure tank under the same strength margin, and obtain a matching design with the equivalent ultimate bearing capacity and strength margins accordingly.
      Methods  To this end, a typical external pressure tank is taken as the research object. On the basis of evaluating the stability and ultimate bearing capacity of the initial structural scheme, the influences of the thicknesses of the pressure tank shell, solid floor and transverse bulkhead on the ultimate bearing capacity are studied. The initial scheme is then adjusted to obtain a scheme with the equivalent strength margins of the pressure hull and pressure tank. In this context, the relationship between the ultimate bearing capacity of the pressure hull and pressure tank is discussed. By strengthening the pressure hull to match the ultimate bearing capacities of the pressure tank and pressure hull, the corresponding strength margins are obtained.
      Results  The results show that thinning the pressure tank shell by 30%, solid floor shell by 33.3% and transverse bulkhead shell by 30% reduces the ultimate bearing capacity of the tank by 16.5%, 36.4% and 0.17% respectively.
      Conclusions  As further analyses show, under the condition of the same strength margin, the ultimate bearing capacity of the pressure hull is much lower than that of the pressure tank. When the strength margin of the pressure tank is about 25% and that of the pressure hull is about 40%, the ultimate bearing capacities of the pressure hull and pressure tank are roughly the same.

     

/

返回文章
返回