YU X, YANG J T, HE Y P, et al. Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(2): 1–9 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03558
Citation: YU X, YANG J T, HE Y P, et al. Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(2): 1–9 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03558

Comparison and hydrodynamic performance analysis of positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger aft hull lines

More Information
  • Received Date: September 12, 2023
  • Revised Date: September 26, 2024
  • Available Online: November 15, 2023
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Ship Research. Creative Commons License
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Objectives 

    As the hydrodynamic performance of a positioning bow type self-propelled cutter suction dredger (CSD) is significantly different from that of an ordinary ship, this paper analyzes its performance in order to assist in the rational selection and design of stern lines.

    Methods 

    First, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method is applied to carry out simulation verification and model resistance test validation. On this basis, the hydrodynamic performance of two hulls with different stern shapes, namely twin deadwood and twin skeg, are compared and analyzed in aspects including calm water resistance behavior, stern wake field, axial wake fraction, and nonuniform level of axial wake field.

    Results 

    The total resistance coefficient of the twin skeg hull is lower than that of the twin deadwood hull at each target speed. At the design speed, the total resistance coefficient of the former is 8.6% lower than that of the latter, while the wake object function (WOF) of the latter is judged to be better than that of the former by 11.0% in terms of nonuniform level of axial wake field.

    Conclusions 

    The results of this study can provide valuable references for the line design and optimization of similar hull types.

  • [1]
    何炎平, 冯长华, 顾敏童, 等. “天鲸”号大型自航绞吸式挖泥船[J]. 船舶工程, 2009, 31(5): 1–5.

    HE Y P, FENG C H, GU M T, et al. Large-sized self-propelled cutter suction dredger named Tianjing[J]. Ship Engineering, 2009, 31(5): 1–5 (in Chinese).
    [2]
    石殉, 陈新权, 刘亚东, 等. 水线面大开口型工程船的阻力试验和节能措施[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2011(4): 41–43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3688.2011.04.012

    SHI X, CHEN X Q, LIU Y D, et al. Resistance tests and energy-saving measures of work ships with notches[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2011(4): 41–43 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3688.2011.04.012
    [3]
    曹雪. 内河大型自航绞吸挖泥船的阻力性能研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2013.

    CAO X. Study on resistance performance of inland large self-propelled cutter suction dredger[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2013 (in Chinese).
    [4]
    LÜ H G, GU J Y, LIU W M, et al. Research on the mechanism and characteristic of added resistance of moonpool with recess[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2019, 23(6): 660–673.
    [5]
    姚震球, 孙硕, 凌宏杰, 等. 不同月池形状对钻井船附加阻力的影响[J]. 造船技术, 2020(2): 7–12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3878.2020.02.002

    YAO Z Q, SUN S, LING H J, et al. Influence of different moonpool shape on additional resistance of drilling vessel[J]. Marine Technology, 2020(2): 7–12 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3878.2020.02.002
    [6]
    詹星宇, 毛筱菲. 船舶月池的阻力与流场特性及其改进型式[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2020, 15(3): 45–53, 101. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01594

    ZHAN X Y, MAO X F. The resistance and flow field characteristics of moonpool and its improvement forms[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2020, 15(3): 45–53, 101 (in both Chinese and English). doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01594
    [7]
    谷家扬, 毛沛盛, 陶延武, 等. 航行状态下钻井船月池内流场特性[J]. 船舶工程, 2021, 43(8): 49–56, 113.

    GU J Y, MAO P S, TAO Y W, et al. Flow field characteristics of the drilling ship moonpool under navigation condition[J]. Ship Engineering, 2021, 43(8): 49–56, 113 (in Chinese).
    [8]
    赵桥生, 闫岱峻, 王习建, 等. 深海采矿船月池对阻力性能影响的研究[J]. 中国造船, 2022, 63(1): 215–223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2022.01.019

    ZHAO Q S, YAN D J, WANG X J, et al. Influence of moon pool of deep-sea mining ship on resistance performance based on numerical simulation and model test[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2022, 63(1): 215–223 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2022.01.019
    [9]
    MAO X F, ZHAN X Y, ZHANG W X, et al. Study on the design of moonpool form based on ship resistance and flow field characteristics[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures. Yokohama: Springer, 2021: 425-445.
    [10]
    LEE S K, XU L X. CFD study and model test verification of moonpool configuration modifications for minimizing drillship resistance[C]//Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures. Yokohama: Springer, 2021: 3-27.
    [11]
    张琪, 陈鸽, 张利军, 等. 钻井船型线优化及月池附加阻力研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2019, 43(2): 327–331.

    ZHANG Q, CHEN G, ZHANG L J, et al. Research on hull lines optimization of drilling ship and additional resistance of moonpool[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2019, 43(2): 327–331 (in Chinese).
    [12]
    赵鑫, 孙树政, 任慧龙. 基于CFD不同月池形态船体静水阻力分析[C]//第三十一届全国水动力学研讨会论文集(下册). 厦门: 海洋出版社, 2020: 478−484.

    ZHAO X, SUN S Z, REN H L. CFD based calm water resistance prediction for different moonpools[C]//Proceedings of 31th National Conference on Hydrodynamics. Xiamen: China Ocean Press, 2020: 478−484 (in Chinese).
    [13]
    唐坤, 孙树政, 张敏, 等. 月池对海上工程船水动力性能影响的模型试验[J]. 船舶工程, 2022, 44(6): 53–60.

    TANG K, SUN S Z, ZHANG M, et al. Model test on the hydrodynamic performance influence of moonpool on the offshore engineering ships[J]. Ship Engineering, 2022, 44(6): 53–60 (in Chinese).
    [14]
    姚智, 李德江, 徐刚, 等. 月池开放和封闭状态下钻井船阻力性能试验研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2023, 18(2): 176–183. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02553

    YAO Z, LI D J, XU G, et al. Experimental study of drillship resistance performance in open and closed state of moonpool[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(2): 176–183 (in both Chinese and English). doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02553
    [15]
    魏斯行. 基于CFD近似模型的船舶阻力与伴流不均匀度优化研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2020.

    WEI S X. Study on optimization of ship resistance and wake non-uniformity based on CFD approximation model[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020 (in Chinese).
    [16]
    胡俊明. 基于RANS法虚拟试验水池的船舶快速性预报研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018.

    HU J M. Study on ship performance prediction based on virtual experimental tank of RANS method[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018 (in Chinese).
    [17]
    盛振邦, 刘应中. 船舶原理(下册)[M]. 上海: 上海交通大学出版社, 2004: 41−44.

    SHENG Z B, LIU Y Z. Principles of ships (Volume II) [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2004: 41−44 (in Chinese).
    [18]
    VAN DER PLOEG A, HOEKSTRA M. Multi-objective optimization of a tanker afterbody using PARNASSOS[C]//12th Numerical Towing Tank Symposium (NuTTS). Cortona, Italy, 2009: 142−148.
    [19]
    ITTC. The specialist committee on CFD in marine hydrodynamics-recommended procedures and guidelines: practical guidelines for ship CFD applications[C]//Proceeding of the 26th ITTC. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ITTC, 2011.
    [20]
    International Towing Tank Conference. CFD, resistance and flow uncertainty analysis in CFD, examples for resistance and flow: 7.5-03-02-01[S]. ITTC, 2017.
    [21]
    ITTC. Subjects 2-4: skin friction and turbulence stimulation[C]//Proceeding of the 8th ITTC. Madrid, Spanish: ITTC, 1957.

Catalog

    Article views (131) PDF downloads (9) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return